I've had to add a lot to unit 4. Not only did I toss in all the ecology standards, but I also needed to cover the biological macromolecules in more depth than the AMTA lesson plan suggested.
The AMTA lesson plan has students researching proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids on their own with a few guiding questions, then jumping in to comparative dissections. My state EOC exam tests pretty darn heavily on proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids-- especially the structures and how to determine their presence in the laboratory. Plus, our biology teachers here usually save our dissection for the last days of class after the EOC exam, since dissection and internal anatomy are not tested. So, I ended up skipping the dissections (for now) and spending more time on the macromolecules.
Having the students research the macromolecules with guiding questions was futile. First of all, when given the option of textbook or Google, students always go to Google. I don't think that is necessarily a bad thing, as textbooks are becoming utilized less and less, even at the collegiate level. But... as sophomores in high school, students can be easily led astray by misinformation online. Especially on a topic like this, which is loaded with intimidating new vocabulary like "monosaccharide" or "polypeptide." The whiteboard results I got, to put it simply, were really bad. I still think it was a good activity, but I will definitely limit them to the textbook next time to avoid wasting nearly an entire class period. Instead of dissections, we then went to the lab to practice testing for macromolecules.
Sudan IV testing for lipids |
What I decided to do was combine a yeast balloon lab with the next activity in the lesson plan, which is modeling cellular respiration with ball and stick models. First, students created balloons with yeast and differing amounts of warm water, sugar, and air:
They measure initial diameter, set their balloons aside, while I briefly introduced them to the term "cellular respiration." They were instructed to make a model of a glucose molecule and 6 diatomic oxygen molecules:
Then we revisited our balloons and determined change in diameter.
We didn't get much time to discuss or create a consensus. My plan tomorrow is to hold a board meeting with a verbal, mathematical, and diagrammatic representation of cellular respiration based on the results of the two activities. And I guess I'll see what I get!
No comments:
Post a Comment